logo

FDA issued a warning about the dangers of certain vaginal treatments

Junie Sihlangu
Aug 01, 2018
04:25 P.M.

On Monday, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned that devices that are energy-based were not approved for vaginal 'rejuvenation' and/or cosmetic vaginal procedures.

Advertisement

The FDA warned that energy-based devices were being used to perform dangerous procedures. These included vaginal ‘rejuvenation,’ cosmetic vaginal procedures, or non-surgical vaginal procedures to treat symptoms related to menopause, urinary incontinence, or sexual function.

According to the FDA, the safety and effectiveness of these medical devices to perform these procedures have not been established. The administration said the use of these tools for such procedures may be associated with ‘serious adverse events.’ For more on this story go to our Twitter account @amomama_usa.

This week, the FDA announced that energy-based devices like radiofrequency or laser received their clearance for general gynecologic tool indications.

Advertisement

These included the destruction of abnormal or pre-cancerous cervical or vaginal tissue and condylomas (genital warts).

‘We are aware that certain device manufacturers may be marketing their energy-based medical device for vaginal "rejuvenation" and/or cosmetic vaginal procedures.’

FDA, July 30, 2018

They clearly stated that:

‘The safety and effectiveness of energy-based devices for treatment of these conditions has not been established.’

These devices have also been used to treat vaginal laxity, vaginal atrophy, dryness, or itching, pain during sexual intercourse, pain during urination, and decreased sexual sensation.

Advertisement

The devices were not cleared or approved for marketing to treat these symptoms or conditions. The dangers of using these machines for what they weren’t prescribed for may include vaginal burns, scarring, pain during sexual intercourse, and recurring/chronic pain.

The FDA advised that f you have undergone treatment for vaginal ‘rejuvenation’ and experienced any complications; it would be wise to file a report through MedWatch.

Advertisement

This is the FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting program. Companies that are marketing these devices beyond their scope have been contacted by the FDA.

Those who have questions can contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) at DICE@FDA.HHS.GOV, 800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Related posts

How Michael Jackson Would Look without Plastic Surgery before His Passing At 50: Photo via AI

May 02, 2024

How Cher Would Look At 77 If She Never Had a Facelift or Dyed Her Hair: Photos via Al

May 01, 2024

How 3 World-Famous Beauty Icons Would Look Today If They Had Never Used Plastic Surgery: Photos via AI

April 11, 2024

Melanie Griffith's Transformation - Her Journey with Fillers to Her Look Now at 66

June 26, 2024

Fans Said Jennifer Aniston No Longer Resembles Herself Due to Injections: How She Would Look Naturally Today via AI

May 28, 2024

5 Celebrity Duos Who Defy the Notion of Being the Same Age

March 26, 2024

7 Beauties of the Past: How Famous Actresses Have Changed over Decades

April 16, 2024

6 Astounding Celebrity Hair Transformations – Photos to Compare

May 22, 2024

7 Famous Celebrities You Would Never Recognize in Photos before They Did Plastic Surgery

April 11, 2024

How Jane Fonda Would Look Today at 86 If She Had Never Undergone Plastic Surgery — Photos Created by AI

March 19, 2024

Fans Say Marlo Thomas ‘Destroyed’ Her Beauty with Surgery: How She Would Look Today Naturally via AI

May 23, 2024

How Sharon Osbourne Would Look Today If She Never Underwent Plastic Surgery: 4 AI Photos

June 05, 2024

‘Botox and Fillers’: ‘American Idol’s Lionel Richie, 74, Sparks Heated Stir with ’Different’ Face in Recent Video

May 21, 2024

10 Celebs You'd Hardly Know Had Striking Teeth Makeovers – Contrasting Pics

May 24, 2024