The Public Reacts to Recommended Sentence Change for the Menendez Brothers: What Happened in Court?

Over three decades after Lyle and Erik Menendez were sentenced to life without parole for their parents' murders, a possible shift in their fate has stirred public debate, with many strongly opposed.

Given their behavior in prison, the Los Angeles District Attorney believes the Menendez brothers deserve a second chance. His recommendation has sparked debate on whether they should be re-evaluated for possible reintegration into society.

Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón recommended on October 25, 2024, that a judge resentence the Menendez brothers. This follows a review initiated after defense attorneys in 2023 presented new evidence alleging abuse by their father. His recommendation could open a path to the siblings' potential release.

The recent buzz around the Menendez brothers' case grew this year after a recent documentary revealed the alleged abuse they suffered from their father. This prompted the public to submit multiple requests to the government, leading George to reevaluate their case.

Now, a hearing on the resentencing issue may take place within the next 30 to 45 days. Afterward, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge will determine whether the Menendez brothers will be resentenced.

George expressed his support for reducing their sentences to life with the possibility of parole, which typically entails serving 50 years to life. However, since the brothers committed their crimes before turning 26, they qualify for youthful parole under California law.

The public has expressed a mix of outrage and support over the possible sentence change, with most individuals opposing the idea. One commenter declared ardently, "They need to stay in prison!" and another user echoed, "They killed their parents, I don't know how they would be able to get out. Like come on, that’s saying all inmates who killed after 35 years should come out. No 🧐. "

Others were firm about maintaining the original sentence, with a user saying, "Keep them in prison, they're dangerous." An individual with similar sentiments noted, "They deserve the sentence the [sic] already received."

Some people were less forgiving, calling the potential release "outrageous," while one comment displayed noticeable frustration over the suggestion, reading, "Recommebs immediate release Hopefully the sentencing judges disagrees [sic]."

Meanwhile, supporters saw the decades served as justification for release, saying, "30 years is time served under their circumstances. Release the both of them." Others shared hopeful sentiments, like "I hope they get out!!" An optimistic user also concurred, "I really hope this goes well for them."

While most people oppose the idea of reducing the Menendez brothers' sentences, George has shared his rationale for the recommendation. Calling the brothers "model prisoners," he expressed his belief that there was a strong possibility they would be paroled if the case reached the parole board.

Even so, George pointed out, "I will never excuse murder, and those were brutal, premeditated murders. They were appropriately sentenced at the time when they were tried. They got life without the possibility of parole."

"I just think that given the current state of the law and given our assessment of their behavior in prison, they deserve the opportunity to be re-evaluated and perhaps reintegrated into the community,” Gascón explained the reason behind his recommendation.

This case is being reexamined over 35 years after the fatal shooting of Jose and Kitty Menendez in their Beverly Hills mansion in 1989. Their sons, aged 21 and 18 at the time, were arrested less than a year later in 1990 and convicted of first-degree murder in 1996.

During the highly publicized trials, the brothers acknowledged killing their parents. However, they claimed it was in self-defense after suffering a lifetime of physical and sexual abuse from their father.

The first trial, notable for being one of the first televised cases, ended in a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury. In their second trial, much of the evidence related to the alleged sexual abuse was excluded, leading to their conviction in 1996 and subsequent life sentences.

While several factors contributed to the recommendation for resentencing, it remains unclear whether the now 50-something brothers could actually be released from prison.

As we previously reported, new evidence has surfaced, raising questions about the brothers' guilt and sparking renewed hope for their freedom. In May 2023, a new twist emerged when their legal team filed a petition in Los Angeles County Superior Court, pointing to newly uncovered evidence that could change the narrative.

Among the bombshell findings was a letter Erik had written to his cousin, Andy Cano, months before the murders. In the letter, Erik detailed the alleged sexual abuse by their father—evidence that remained hidden for years, only surfacing in 2015 after Andy's personal effects were finally examined.

"Nobody had looked at [the cousin's personal] effects until 2015, and that's when it was found, 10 years after our last appeal,” said Mark Geragos, the brothers' post-conviction attorney, in an interview with People.

Mark explained that the judge has three possible courses of action: he can reject the petition outright, require a formal response from the district attorney, or—what's already in motion—request an informal response. The district attorney has taken this seriously, dedicating the last 15 months to examining the new evidence they had brought forward.

This latest chapter adds to the intrigue of the infamous case, and a notable figure is back in the spotlight: Leslie Abramson, the fiery defense attorney who famously represented Erik in the original trials. Teaming up with her long-time colleague, Gerald Chaleff—known for defending the Hillside Strangler—Leslie is once again taking up the fight for Erik's freedom. Gerald, meanwhile, is representing Lyle.

Rumors have long swirled about the hefty fees these two legal powerhouses have commanded, with whispers suggesting that each was paid a staggering $700,000 for their services. But whether that figure is fact or fiction remains one of the many mysteries surrounding the Menendez brothers.

Still, despite the Menendez brothers' fierce representation, Los Angeles defense attorney and former senior deputy district attorney Dmitry Gorin, argues that the likelihood of the brothers being released from prison is very low.

What's clear is that the stakes are high. If the brothers succeed in overturning their convictions, they stand to inherit a $14 million estate, a fortune that was once tantalizingly close. The idea that money might buy their freedom has fueled much speculation.

Yet, despite facing a lifetime behind bars, both Lyle and Erik managed to find love and tie the knot. Erik, 28 at the time, married Tammi Ruth Saccoman, 37, in a low-key ceremony at California State Prison in June 1999.

The wedding, held in the prison's visiting room, was officiated by a Deputy Commissioner of Marriage from the Sacramento County Recorder's Office, according to prison spokesperson Billy Mayfield. Despite the union, Erik was not granted conjugal visits.

A few years later, in November 2003, Lyle followed suit. He exchanged vows with 33-year-old Rebecca Sneed in a maximum-security visiting area at Mule Creek State Prison, near Sacramento.

Lyle, 35 at the time, had known Rebecca for about a decade before they decided to wed. Although family and friends attended the ceremony, prison regulations prevented any intimate contact, as conjugal visits are not permitted for inmates serving life sentences.

As the legal battles continue, the question remains: Will this new evidence be enough to bring Lyle and Erik back to the tennis courts and swimming pools of Beverly Hills? Or will their fate remain sealed behind prison bars?