What Would Princess Diana Look Like at 64 If She Were Still with Us? AI Edition

From her early days as a nanny to her most iconic moments, scroll to the end for a powerful series of photos — including digitally aged images of how the Princess could have looked today.

It has been nearly 29 years since Diana, former Princess of Wales, lost her life in a tragic car crash in Paris, France, on August 31, 1997.

The accident that claimed her life, and that of Dodi Fayed and driver Henri Paul, sent shockwaves around the globe, leaving an unfillable void in the British Royal Family and in the hearts of millions.

At just 36 years old, the woman who had once been dubbed "the People's Princess" was gone — her life cut short, her legacy left to history.

But before the world mourned her passing, the Princess took a step that would change the way the public saw her — and ultimately intensify the scrutiny she lived under.

On November 5, 1995, inside the quiet of Kensington Palace, she recorded what would become one of the most explosive interviews in royal history.

With her staff dismissed for the day and no makeup artist or royal press team in sight, she met with a BBC crew led by journalist Martin Bashir.

The interview was arranged in secret, a deliberate act by Princess Diana, who believed that telling her story on her own terms was worth the risk.

The result aired two weeks later on "Panorama" on November 20, 1995. In it, the Princess spoke candidly about bulimia, infidelity, and life within the Royal Family.

She confirmed her own affair with James Hewitt and famously remarked, "There were three of us in this marriage," in reference to King Charles III's relationship with Queen Camilla.

The interview reached an audience of more than 200 million worldwide and instantly became a defining moment in modern monarchy. However, decades later, a darker truth would emerge.

In 2021, a report led by Lord Dyson concluded that Martin had used forged bank documents and false claims to manipulate Princess Diana into the interview — a deception that not only broke BBC guidelines, but deeply affected the Princess's fragile sense of trust.

The inquiry revealed that Martin had preyed on her vulnerability by fabricating stories suggesting those closest to her — including her private secretary and aides to His Majesty — were spying on her.

These tactics, the report found, were instrumental in securing the late royal's cooperation. Princess Diana's brother, Charles Spencer, was the key intermediary, unknowingly drawn in by Martin's lies.

A book, "Dianarama: Deception, Entrapment, Cover-Up—The Betrayal of Princess Diana," written by investigative journalist Andy Webb — who spent two decades uncovering the full extent of the scandal — and published on November 25, 2025, expands on this.

The book outlines how Martin's claims — including a fabricated story that a royal nanny had undergone an abortion paid for by King Charles — helped drive the Princess towards that interview.

"She was in a state of justified anxiety," said her former private secretary Patrick Jephson, who later resigned without understanding why Princess Diana had abruptly distanced herself from him.

According to Andy's research, Martin's influence was so pervasive that he and the Princess rehearsed for the interview together in the palace kitchen before filming began.

Princess Diana, already shaken by years of press intrusion and royal tension, had reason to feel hunted. The notorious "Squidgygate" tapes, the collapse of her marriage, and her increasingly isolated position within the Royal Family left her deeply vulnerable.

Close friend Rosa Monckton recalled, "She was frail, and that made her susceptible." Furthermore, in a heartbreaking revelation shared by Rosa, Princess Diana confided during a holiday in Greece in August 1997 — just 10 days before her death — that she regretted the interview.

Not because of what she had said, but because of the impact it may have had on Prince William and Prince Harry, who were then only 15 and 12. Her maternal instinct, even in those final days, remained central to her thoughts.

Now, nearly three decades on, the image of Princess Diana remains frozen in time. We remember her as she was — a symbol of compassion, elegance, and vulnerability.

Yet, in an age of artificial intelligence, technology offers us a glimpse into what might have been. Through AI-generated portraits, we can also imagine — heartbreakingly — what she might have looked like at 64 if she were still with us today.

1980

1982

1986

1987

1990

1992

1994

1995

1996

1997

Princess Diana Reimagined Through AI